Skip to content
HHarry Hungry: Where to EatFree · View in the App StoreView
HHarry Hungry: Where to EatFree · Get it on Google PlayGet

Cuisine guide · data as of 8 October 2026

Thai food scores highest in London and New York, on the data

Across 381 scored Thai places, London and New York lead on average, while the best value sits in a few specific kitchens rather than any one city.

Places scored
381
Scoring 90+
11
Cities compared
12
Median Harry score
79

The ten best-scored thai places

Ranked by Harry score among places with at least 150 reviews. Chains are counted once. Scores are explained on the how-it-works page.

#PlaceCityHarryWorth itNotes
1Wanjai Restaurant & BarthaiSan Francisco, CA9482Smart Spend
2Weladee Thai KitchenthaiAustin, TX9482Smart Spend
3Kub Kao ThaithaiLondon9381Smart Spend
4AngloThaithaiLondon9281Smart Spend · Michelin Guide · National Restaurant Awards
5Spelling Thai BistrothaiLos Angeles, CA9281Smart Spend
6Ler LersthaiNew York, NY9180—
7Siam Thai ExpressthaiNew York, NY9180—
8Valla TablethaiNew York, NY9080—
9Jan Jao Kha Thai RestaurantthaiNew York, NY9080—
10Prung Asian CuisinethaiNew York, NY9080—

Is London or New York the better city for Thai?

London averages 84 across 49 places, and New York averages 83 across 62. That gap is small, and with a larger sample in New York it is the more convincing result of the two. Either city gives you a good chance of a strong meal wherever you land.

New Orleans comes third at 80.5 across 17 places, which is a thinner sample but a respectable showing. Los Angeles follows on 77.6 across 34. At the bottom of the ranking, San Jose averages 66.5 across 20 places and Miami 69.9 across 13. Those are not verdicts on every kitchen there, only a sign that the average pick is less likely to impress. If you are choosing blind, the top two cities are the safer bet.

Which city does it best?

Cities with at least twelve scored places for this cuisine, ranked by average Harry score.

The top ten is not a London and New York monopoly

Ten places score 90 or above in the top-ten list, and they are spread across five cities. Wanjai Restaurant & Bar in San Francisco and Weladee Thai Kitchen in Austin lead on 94, ahead of Kub Kao Thai in London on 93. That matters because San Francisco averages only 76.4 and Austin 74.5. A city with a modest average can still hold a standout.

New York supplies five of the ten, including Ler Lers, Siam Thai Express, Valla Table, Jan Jao Kha Thai Restaurant and Prung Asian Cuisine, all on 90 or 91. Across the whole set, 11 places score 90 or more. The top end is narrow, and a score in the 90s is rare.

Best value in the data

Places scoring 70 or above on the Harry score, ranked by Worth It score.

#PlaceCityHarryWorth itNotes
1Wanjai Restaurant & BarthaiSan Francisco, CA9482Smart Spend
2Weladee Thai KitchenthaiAustin, TX9482Smart Spend
3Kaew Jao JormthaiNew York, NY8981Great Value
47 ElephantsthaiNew York, NY8781Great Value
5Kub Kao ThaithaiLondon9381Smart Spend
6AngloThaithaiLondon9281Smart Spend · Michelin Guide · National Restaurant Awards

Where does the value actually sit?

The best Worth It scores cluster tightly. Wanjai Restaurant & Bar and Weladee Thai Kitchen both reach 82 on value alongside a Harry Hungry score of 94, which is the strongest combination in the data. Kub Kao Thai, AngloThai and Spelling Thai Bistro follow on 81 or 80-plus, and all carry the Smart Spend badge.

In New York, Kaew Jao Jorm (89 quality, 81 value) and 7 Elephants (87, 81) earn Great Value badges without reaching the 90s. That is a useful distinction: you do not need the highest quality score to get the best return. Price data is thin, though. Only 20 places have a confirmed $$ tier, so value here rests on the scores rather than on menu prices.

What does acclaim tell you that reviews do not?

Michelin Guide recognition appears 13 times across the Thai set, the most frequent source in the acclaim data. James Beard Foundation and Eater 38 each appear 3 times. Yet most of the top ten carry no acclaim at all. Only AngloThai in London lists any, with the Michelin Guide and National Restaurant Awards.

So the highest-scoring places are largely crowd-driven results, and critics' lists point to a partly different set of restaurants. Treat acclaim as a second opinion rather than a substitute for the score. It can flag somewhere ambitious that review platforms undersell, but it does not predict the highest ratings from diners.

When Google and Yelp disagree

Platforms do not always agree. Plue in New York sits on 4.8 on Google from 1,646 reviews but 3.8 on Yelp from 226. Myrtle Thai has the same split: 4.8 on Google from 3,917 reviews against 3.8 on Yelp from 271. Thai Food Express in Los Angeles shows 4.5 against 3.5, and Tiparos Thai Cuisine & Sushi Bar in Chicago 4.2 against 3.3.

A full point of difference suggests the two audiences want different things, or that one platform skews generous. The Google counts are large, so those ratings are not flukes. Read these places as popular, with a more mixed Yelp following. If a place is strong on both, that is a more reliable signal.

Where the review platforms disagree

Places with at least 150 reviews on both platforms and a gap of 0.4 to 1.0 stars. Yelp is used for US cities, Tripadvisor elsewhere.

PlaceCityGoogleOther platform
PlueNew York, NY4.8 (1,646)Yelp 3.8 (226)
Myrtle ThaiNew York, NY4.8 (3,917)Yelp 3.8 (271)
Thai Food ExpressLos Angeles, CA4.5 (444)Yelp 3.5 (166)
Tiparos Thai Cuisine & Sushi BarChicago, IL4.2 (419)Yelp 3.3 (330)

The short version

Start in London or New York for the best odds, but do not skip Wanjai in San Francisco or Weladee in Austin, which top the list on 94. For value, look for Smart Spend and Great Value badges, and check both Google and Yelp before trusting a single rating.

Every figure on this page is computed from Harry Hungry's own database on 8 October 2026; the commentary is written with AI assistance from those figures and checked against them. Scores blend Google, Yelp and Tripadvisor with editorial acclaim; see how they work. No placement on this page is paid for.