Skip to content
HHarry Hungry: Where to EatFree · View in the App StoreView
HHarry Hungry: Where to EatFree · Get it on Google PlayGet

We do the scrolling. You choose dinner.

Two honest scores, one verdict, ten places. Here's exactly how they're put together — no "algorithm" hand-waving, no pretending it's magic.

Harry Hungry is mostly automated. The scores are built from published reviews, critic coverage and other public signals, weighted by rules — not from a personal visit to every restaurant.

Methodology last updated

  1. 01

    You say what you fancy

    A cuisine, a mood, a neighbourhood. As loose or as fussy as you like.

  2. 02

    We look in more than one place

    Google, Yelp, Tripadvisor, the proper critics, booking sites — the evidence, gathered.

  3. 03

    We check what deserves believing

    Weight the trustworthy, discount the shouty, and flag it when the sources disagree.

  4. 04

    You get ten places

    Ranked, with two honest scores and a plain-English verdict. Not three hundred. Ten.

Thousands of opinions  →  checked & weighted  →  ten answers

Score 01

Harry Hungry Score

How good does it appear to be?

87
/ 100 · e.g.

A 0–100 read on quality — kitchen, service, room, the lot. Built from the sources below, then adjusted for how much evidence there is and whether the sources agree.

See the ingredients
Harry Hungry Score weighting
Google28%Loud, generous, the big crowd. Useful for moderation.
Critics22%Eater, Infatuation, Michelin. The ones who go for a living.
Yelp16%Sharper, crankier, occasionally unhinged.
Tripadvisor8%Mostly tourists. Weighted down accordingly.
Aggregators17%OpenTable, Facebook, Zomato and Foursquare — breadth, where a place is listed.
Signals5%Reservation platforms, recent buzz, freshness.
Instagram4%A tiny buzz check. Not a substitute for anything.

Starting weights. The mix changes with which sources are available and trustworthy in a given city, redistributed across whatever a place actually has.

Score 02

Worth It Score

Will you be pleased when the bill arrives?

72
/ 100 · e.g.

A separate 0–100 read on value — not a cheapness score. A $180 dinner can score higher than a $14 sandwich if it earns it.

Expensive is not the same as overpriced.

See the ingredients
Worth It Score weighting
Satisfaction45%Quality, consistency, service, room.
Fairness30%Portion honesty and what else is nearby for the money.
Distinctiveness15%Can you get this experience for less down the road?
Hype tax10%The more hype, the higher the regret risk.

Harry doesn't punish a place for costing money. Only for not being worth it.

The H Stars

The headline on top of the score

A 1-to-3-star award for the restaurants that are consistently highly rated across the available evidence. Price-blind — a taco stand and a tasting menu compete on the same axis — and impossible to buy. A star only goes to a place with a verified review base (real volume, or genuine critic coverage), never a thin or gameable sample. The top tier (H★★★) demands more still: the sources have to agree, and there has to be a spark of distinctiveness.

★
score ≥ 88

Consistently excellent, on a solid, verified base.

★★
score ≥ 93

A cut above — one of the better tables in town.

★★★
score ≥ 96

The best in town — sources agree, and it's genuinely distinctive.

Quick to earn, slow to lose: a star only drops after two review cycles running below the line — never yanked on one noisy week. See who holds one →

Confidence

How much evidence is behind it

A score is only as good as the evidence under it — and that's not just a review count. Every place carries a confidence read, so a 90 from three reviews never outranks an 84 from three thousand.

Limited

Thin evidence — under 25 reviews and no critic coverage. Shown, but held at arm's length.

Good

A solid sample, or genuine critic coverage. The score is worth trusting.

Strong

A deep sample (past 250 reviews) or several sources agreeing. As sure as Harry gets.

Source disagreement

When the internet has an argument

The sources often disagree. That disagreement is a signal in itself — Harry reads it and adjusts, then tells you why on the card. The size of the nudge depends on the sample and the sources present, so these are illustrations, not fixed deductions.

The value verdicts

Eight ways to read the bill

Every result earns one Worth It verdict — a one-line read on whether the money's well spent.

The city guides

Ten, or it says so

Every city shortlist — best, by cuisine, by occasion, by neighbourhood — is built to hold exactly ten places that clear Harry's bar, ranked by the score the page names: the Harry Hungry Score, or the Worth It Score on the value and cheap-eats lists. (Cuisine lists put genuine matches for the cuisine first.) Harry never pads a list to reach ten. Where fewer qualify, the page says how many, and it stays out of search results until it fills.

The honest bit

What Harry doesn't know

Right then. What do you fancy?

Find ten good places →

More: About Harry Hungry · The H Stars · Harry's best · Worth It ranking.