Skip to content
HHarry Hungry: Where to EatFree · View in the App StoreView
HHarry Hungry: Where to EatFree · Get it on Google PlayGet

Khao Bird

“4.6 across 203 Google reviews; listed in the Michelin Guide.”

Rank 1.

Khao Bird

thai · London W1F 0SN

Michelin Guide

4.6 across 203 Google reviews; listed in the Michelin Guide.

Harry HungryHarry's headline verdict, 0–100. How good the place actually is, once the loud reviews and the timid critics have cancelled each other out.
Worth ItWorth-It Score, 0–100. Whether the bill is fair for what lands on the table. High means good value; low means you're paying for the postcode.
$$ · Open nowToday · 12:00 — 23:00G4.6T3.5YMS
Google4.6(203)Tripadvisor3.5(12)Yelpnot on yelp2/ 3 sources
Score breakdown

Sources used

Google4.6 ★203 reviews
Tripadvisor3.5 ★12 reviews

Signal confidence

55%Moderate · 2 sources

Score adjustments

Google's into it. Tripadvisor isn't. Locals are louder here.-8 pts
  • Google's into it. Tripadvisor isn't. Locals are louder here.

WarningGoogle's into it. Tripadvisor isn't. Locals are louder here.

Is Khao Bird worth it?

Smart Spend. Harry scores Khao Bird 70/100 for quality and 70/100 on the Worth It scale for London. One caveat: Google's into it. Tripadvisor isn't. Locals are louder here.

Michelin lists Khao Bird, Google's 203 reviewers back that up at 4.6, but Tripadvisor tells a different story: 3.5 from just 12 people. That's not really a contradiction so much as a case of thin sample size on one platform swamping the signal — twelve reviews can swing wildly, whereas 203 is a real base. Treat the Michelin nod and the Google number as the reliable read, and ignore the Tripadvisor score as noise rather than a genuine split in opinion.

One card, one verdict. Pulled from current data, not a stale snapshot. Want the methodology? How Harry scores.

Related: Harry's best · Trending this week · The tribunal · Browse by occasion · The standing · The dossier · The hype radar · By city · By cuisine · Worth It ranking · Tourist trap index.