Skip to content
HHarry Hungry: Where to EatFree · View in the App StoreView
HHarry Hungry: Where to EatFree · Get it on Google PlayGet

Cafe Cecilia

“4.5 across 539 Google reviews, and Tripadvisor lands in the same place; listed in the Michelin Guide.”

Rank 1.

Cafe Cecilia

London E8 4FX

Michelin Guide

4.5 across 539 Google reviews, and Tripadvisor lands in the same place; listed in the Michelin Guide.

Harry HungryHarry's headline verdict, 0–100. How good the place actually is, once the loud reviews and the timid critics have cancelled each other out.
Worth ItWorth-It Score, 0–100. Whether the bill is fair for what lands on the table. High means good value; low means you're paying for the postcode.
$$ · ClosedClosed todayG4.5T4.2YMS
Google4.5(539)Tripadvisor4.2(24)Yelpnot on yelp2/ 3 sources
Score breakdown

Sources used

Google4.5 ★539 reviews
Tripadvisor4.2 ★24 reviews

Signal confidence

61%Moderate · 2 sources

Is Cafe Cecilia worth it?

Smart Spend. Harry scores Cafe Cecilia 77/100 for quality and 74/100 on the Worth It scale for London. No paid placements, no affiliate links — just the arithmetic.

The split here is in volume, not sentiment: 539 Google reviews at 4.5 versus a thin 24 on Tripadvisor at 4.2, so you're mostly trusting a large, consistent local crowd rather than a broad base of tourist feedback. A Michelin Guide listing backs that up as a positive, which tracks with a $$ breakfast-and-lunch spot that's being taken seriously without pretending to be more than it is. No ranking given, so there's no read on how it stacks up against the E8 competition directly — just that the numbers it does have agree with each other.

One card, one verdict. Pulled from current data, not a stale snapshot. Want the methodology? How Harry scores.

Related: Harry's best · Trending this week · The tribunal · Browse by occasion · The standing · The dossier · The hype radar · By city · By cuisine · Worth It ranking · Tourist trap index.