Skip to content
HHarry Hungry: Where to EatFree · View in the App StoreView
HHarry Hungry: Where to EatFree · Get it on Google PlayGet

Fischers

“4.4 across 2.1k Google reviews; a rave from Condé Nast Traveller.”

Rank 1.

Fischers

british

4.4 across 2.1k Google reviews; a rave from Condé Nast Traveller.

Harry HungryHarry's headline verdict, 0–100. How good the place actually is, once the loud reviews and the timid critics have cancelled each other out.
Worth ItWorth-It Score, 0–100. Whether the bill is fair for what lands on the table. High means good value; low means you're paying for the postcode.
Verdict: Paying for the Scene
$$$ · ClosedClosed todayG4.4T4.1YMS
Google4.4(2.1k)Tripadvisor4.1(1.1k)Yelpnot on yelp2/ 3 sources
Score breakdown

Sources used

Google4.4 ★2.1k reviews
Tripadvisor4.1 ★1.1k reviews

Signal confidence

95%Strong · 2 sources

Score adjustments

Tripadvisor likes it, which may mean tourists like it. Proceed with mild suspicion.-5 pts
  • Tripadvisor likes it, which may mean tourists like it. Proceed with mild suspicion.

WarningTripadvisor likes it, which may mean tourists like it. Proceed with mild suspicion.

Is Fischers worth it?

Paying for the Scene. Harry scores Fischers 77/100 for quality and 72/100 on the Worth It scale. One caveat: Tripadvisor likes it, which may mean tourists like it. Proceed with mild suspicion.

One card, one verdict. Pulled from current data, not a stale snapshot. Want the methodology? How Harry scores.

Related: Harry's best · Trending this week · The tribunal · Browse by occasion · The standing · The dossier · The hype radar · By city · By cuisine · Worth It ranking · Tourist trap index.